The San Antonio Spurs: Nothing makes a team look old and creaky quite like facing a young, running, gunning team on the road on the second night of back-to-backs. And that's exactly what happened to the "new-look" Spurs last night.
Sure, Tim Duncan (28 points, 16 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals, 3 blocks) tortured the Bulls like they had just cut off his mom's head,
Mrs. Voorhees-style. But the rest of the Spurs? Well, if you're a San Antonio fan, watching them get walked all over by a less-talented Bulls team had to be almost as disturbing as these
Robert Pattinson underwear:
Why, God? Why?On the subject, come on,
Twighlight fans. Is this kind of stuff
really necessary? Isn't it bad enough that your beloved book-turned-movie series has finalized the emasculation of the American vampire -- which was begun by Anne Rice, by the way -- turning the former terrifying creatures of the night into day-walking teddy bears who spend more time planning for the prom than kicking ass without plastering your hunky star's vamp face onto the casing intended for a male crotch? Why not just write some fan fiction where Edward blows somebo...
oops, too late.
How did all this start, anyway? Oh, right. So the Spurs not named Tim Duncan sucked ass last night. Tony Parker (former Finals MVP) and Manu Ginobili (who really, really needs to just shave his damn head) combined to shoot 7-for-22. The team was slaughtered on the offensive boards in the first half, giving up 10 for 19 second-chance points going Chicago's way. For the game, the Bulls (a notoriously bad rebounding team last season) outrebounded the Spurs 52-44 (including 15-8 on the offensive glass) and had a 23-12 edge in second-chance points.
Despite Ducan's 13-for-19 performance, the Spurs shot 42 percent for the game, 19 percent from downtown (4-for-21) and only 65 percent from the line (15-for-23).
Richard Jefferson: He was San Antonio's biggest offseason acquisition...and through two games, he's their biggest bust. This went somewhat unnoticed because the Spurs thrashed the Hornets on opening night, but Jefferson stunk it up in his first game for his new team (5 points, 1-for-7). He wasn't much better in his second game, scoring only 9 points on 3-for-9 shooting. I understand that it's going to take him time to adjust to Pop's system, but Jefferson has looked like a poor fit so far.
John Salmons: The Fish Man is supposed to be the Bulls' replacement for Ben Gordon (and Gordon's 20+ points per game). Well, Chicago fans who freaked out when management let Gordon walk had their fears partially justified last night. Salmons went 3-for-15 from the field and 1-for-9 from three-point range. It was like Gordon had left behind his shot selection but not his shot-making ability. For John's sake, let's, uh, hope it was the San Antonio defense.
Greg Oden: Last night featured a classic Greg Oden game. Minutes limited by foul trouble? Check. (22 minutes, 5 fouls) Limited offense? Check. (6 points, 2-for-5 shooting) Enough rebounding and shot-blocking in abbreviated PT to seemingly justify the continuing myth that Oden could be a elite center? Check. (9 boards, 2 blocks) But still, that's pretty disappointing for a former number one overall pick's third season, right?
But wait, there's more. With Portland trailing 95-94 with five seconds left, Greg stepped up to the line with a chance to tie the game or give his team the lead. And he shanked 'em both. Oh dear, free throw fail. And, yeah, it kinda cost his team the game. Said Oden: "This is a tough one. I definitely stepped up there with confidence thinking I was going to hit both and it didn't go that way. I put this loss on me. I need to step up and make those."
The Portland Trail Blazers: Don't put 100 percent of this loss on Oden, though. The Blazers shot 34 percent from the field. It's a little hard to win when you shoot that poorly, especially when your top two players (Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge) combine to go 10-for-31. So I'm wagging my finger at the whole team here.
Nate McMillan, unintentionally dirty quote machine: This nomination comes from Alex B., who lives all the way in Romania. After his team lost last night, Nate paid some unintentionally dirty homage to Carmelo Anthony's 41 points: "The guy showed tonight what he's all about. [The Nuggets] basically gave him the ball and rode him."
The Official (Short) Lacktion Report (by Chris): No night is too brief for lacktion:
Spurs-Bulls: Theo Ratliff's unproductive stint expired after 2:43, but not before he dropped down a foul for a +1 suck differential, also good for the very first Madsen-level Voskuhl of the year at 1:0!
Nuggets-Blazers: While the living embodiment of Geritol bricked from the charity stripe, Denver's Malik Allen mushroomed into a four-second Super Mario!!!!!!
Labels: Chicago Bulls, creepy underwear, San Antonio Spurs, Tim Duncan
"He's [Carmelo] my horse and I will ride him all night"
Also, The Fish Man is the best bawful nickname.
http://willworkforjustice.blogspot.com/2009/10/tim-donaghy-sacto-was-jobbed-in-2002.html
And to see Chicago dismantle the Spurs--my pick to win the whole thing--is doubly depressing.
BTW, guys: I should attend Z-Bo's visit to the "outdated" Arco Arena in three days, right? :D Assuming I'm not stupid enough to buy a front row seat that costs nearly $800, EVEN considering the matchup (as I wrote on in a recent Bawful article).
I'm no Spurs fan, by the way, just making an observation.
All I can see when Ginobili steps on the floor is this HUGE BALD SPOT flopping from one end to the other. The rest of the game seems to become irrelevant- all I can see is the bald spot, and all I can hear is "Dear GOD, what IS THAT THING?" echoing in my perfect ears.
I think he's afraid that if he shaves his head, people will think he's Marcin Gortat's little brother.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwXT-WGWEho&feature=PlayList&p=7CA7394F6C124B10&index=15
But its good to be back! Also, are we going to be getting any season predictions this year? Statbuster, perhaps? I can't take any more of the mainstream media predictions.
You totally Googled that, right? That absolutely wasn't bookmarked or in your Recent History, right? Hahahahahaha (continued nervous laughter) Of course not! I mean, someone told me about it... I TOTALLY didn't know where to find it.
K_Yew -- That's why I'm avoiding that subject like the plague. It's great fodder for Basketbawful, but it just saddens me. I'd rather laugh.
chris -- Please go. Please. I'm begging you.
A -- I think that's about right. I'm not saying he won't be able to adjust to the Pop's system, but the Spurs don't create the kind of offense that made Jefferson look so great in New Jersey. Tony Parker is a dynamic scorer, but he's a lousy point guard. In fact, he really only plays that position because of his size and lack of defensive chops.
ak dave -- +1 for the Princess Bride reference. But you know I'm a sucker for that movie.
Ruben -- Hm. I'll look into the predition thing.
Clifton -- Yes, I Googled it, but even I was shocked at how many results I got. I never realized there was such a strong need for Twighlight slash fiction.
BTW, all these John Salmons jokes warm my heart, simply because he IS a product of a year and a half in basketball purgatory in Natomas...
Sacramento shot 16-for-30 from the line in an OT loss in game 7. In their own crib. That's what "jobbed" them.
Champs fight through officiating BS. In last year's game 4 of the finals, in Orlando, the Magic outshot LA 17-0 in 4th quarter/OT free throws, and LA found a way to win.
Sure, the NBA's officiating blows. Everyone deals with it. If you're a winner, you figure out a way to rise above it. Sorry, but that's the way it's ALWAYS been.
Clifton - You know as well as I do that Mr. Bawful almost surely wrote that piece of fanfic. Now we know why it really took him so long to finish those last couple Living Large installments: he simply had more interesting things to write about :)
I think they're going to be fine, if they can stay healthy. They are my season opener pick to win the title.
Who thinks that Manu and Mr. Longoria are going to have bad seasons? Yeah, me neither. Who thinks McDyess will leave it all on the floor for a championship? Yeah, me too. RJ is a bit of a question mark, but I'm going to demand that we give a guy at least a couple of months to mesh with Pop's system. Heck, the guy has gone from Frank to Pop. It boggles the mind. RJ will actually need to relearn some basketball fundamentals after playing for the Nets that long.
But let's not forget that he's been in pressure situations. He'll contribute nicely. Pop will ensure that.
And Timmy, of course, will be the Big Fundamental.
So, barring Manu's ankle disassembling again, this is the best pick for the 2010 champ.
Yams-- I think Oden will be a good center at best. He has the thing you can't teach (size), but he doesn't seem to have that spark. But he may be a good cog for a contender some day.
Now, Vampires that don't burn in sunlight, but merely sparkle?!---That's retarded.
Vampire Chronicles=decent
Twilight=an unattractive woman's wet dream.
Ok, I'm cool now. Carry on.
So, Bawful, do youlike Rasheed so far? I know it's early, but I thought he really helped the celtics against the Cavs.
For me it comes down to who guards Gasol/Odom (since Duncan's post D will be needed for Bynum), and now that Bowen is gone, who will guard Kobe? If RJ covers Kobe does that leave Manu on Artest? That's a he'll of a lot to ask of a guy Manu's size.
San Antonio is a good team, no question, but I think the matchups strongly favor LA, especially if LA has HCA (which they probably will).
Gasp! A traveling call in garbage time. They really want to prolong this?
On Oden: No. How often do guys suddenly learn to not foul 4 times in the first 2 quarters of a game after they've been doing it for a season and a half?
If he becomes better than Erick Dampier, then I will consider it a mild surprise. Right now he's on about the same level. He could make a career out of being Alonzo Mourning after his transplant. Defense and points off of rebounds only, if you didn't guess.
Although I must say, I think that they could have a chance to go on a winning streak if they keep playing close, considering it's without their best line-up. *knocks on wood*
I'm am riding a high off of a big Suns win, and a big Lakers loss, as well.
Also, to Bawful, I think you've probably been e-mailed 100 times about this video by The Onion, but it's EPIC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coCo5rIX0Ww
--GCII
I had to read that box score twice. Wowsers...
http://deadspin.com/5392067/excerpts-from-the-book-the-nba-doesnt-want-you-to-read
Plus, we all know how difficult repeating is. And LA seemed to have difficulty getting interested in the playoffs last year. I bet their focus is shot this year. Odom? He'll be a flake.
But this game means two things-Jack and Shit, mostly. L.A. was lackadaisical mostly and just cruddy the rest of the time. The Mavs had one hell of a stinker on opening night that they probably wanted to make up for, and sometimes even good teams can't get a shot to fall. Such was the case here. If anyone needs me I'll be busy trying to find a way to permanently silence Reggie Miller's ferengi-looking, Stat-cursing ass. 21-0 indeed. sheesh.
Video ... http://bit.ly/19RdeI
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AhHj7PO3QoWXNdFVzj2AjU28vLYF?slug=ap-grizzlies-iverson&prov=ap&type=lgns
-Confused
And are you really for the biggest suckfest or all suck fests when the grizz play the kings! Who wants to put money on AI doing his hamstring?
And another thing I think this year your tagline should be: "Where blame happens" catchy eh?
Go the P-Funk Suns! The slowest breaking team around...alright.
NarSARSist: If I see more than two helpers from Z-Bo, I will be convinced that we have reached a gap in the time-space continuum.