points negotiator (pointz ni-goh'-shee-eyt'-uhr)
noun. The player or players in a pickup basketball game who are trusted and allowed to pass judgment on any scoring discrepancies.
Usage example: Many times, older players are given the role of points negotiator.Word usage: It never ceases to amaze me how difficult it is for people to keep track of the score during a pickup game. As far as I've been able to determine, the whole 1-pointer/2-pointer scoring system was invented for the sole purpose of making it easier to score the games. Despite the use of the most basic math possible, scoring discrepancies occur with ridiculous frequency...and few things cause more heated conflict on the pickup court.
When a scoring discrepancy happens, both sides feel they're getting screwed. Nobody ever just laughs it off as a simple mistake that can be easily remedied. The interpretation is that points are being
stolen, and with the way people behave during the ensuring debate, you'd think the fate of humankind was riding on the outcome. And I'm not even talking about the outcome of the game. I mean who gets to win the argument about what the "correct" score is.
Many times, these disputes are settled by which team screams the loudest or acts the most ready to solve things through a fistfight. Other times, both teams choose to abide by the ruling of a points negotiator. The points negotiator typically is someone who is known, liked and respected by most of the players. As such, points negotiation usually happens in weekly pickup leagues. It can also happen in generic pickup games with savvy players who give off an aura of authority.
Points negotiators are usually older players, the general assumption being that they are wiser and more mature, and therefore better able to think and react logically. This isn't true whatsoever, but cultural ideology often takes over when conflict resolution is necessary.
Aside from the age factor (which isn't a constant), a points negotiator must have a reputation for making fair calls most of the time. Furthermore, they should have a history free of being on the wrong side of point shaving incidents. Once a player has bungled the score a few times, they lose all point tracking credibility until player turnover reaches 80 to 90 percent.
Moreover, points negotiators must have the ability to remain calm in the face of conflict. If they start cussing and yelling, the other players will lose faith in their ability to remain logical and emotionally detached from the eventual outcome. A single sneer or chuckle of disgust can appear sinister, which will lead some players to conclude that the points negotiator has some specific vested interest in the final decision. And even though that is often the case, people are often comforted by the delusion of impartiality.
Now this final point is very important. A points negotiator will many times be forced to make a ruling he either isn't sure about or knows is incorrect. Dubious decisions are made because a points negotiator is, after all, human and might not have been closely tracking the score. Incorrect rulings are made because sometimes the only way to keep the peace is to let a given team have their way, either because they've been losing all night or because most of the calls have been going against them. Sometimes making everybody happy is more important than the final score.
Unless you're on the team that got hosed.
Labels: pickup basketball, Word of the Day
Not sure what that makes me, but usually I paint it as the other teams fault. That way my team suddenly plays harder because they have that "chip" on their shoulder.
Does this make me a bad or good points negotiator?
Word Verification: Monine (as in: Monine is the next girl that Bawful meets in college)
Most of them are cheating.
Besides that fact, it's easy to lose track of the score in an intense game trying to remember if that 19'8.9434 footer was a 2 or a 3. Or if that basket counted when Old Man Freddy called a foul fourteen plays ago.
If someone insists on cheating us out of points I typically lower our score a couple of more baskets. Then if we win I make some smart-ass comment about how we can't be stopped or if we lose I go home and fix a sandwich.
1) This saves them $2 million from the contract and the tax. (what's in the future is in the future, by then Stojakovic won't be killing their cap)
2) It makes it easier for them to slip under the cap. That would offer them even more savings, and more importantly, it would net them probably somewhere around $2 - $3 million for the kickback teams get from other teams paying the luxury tax.
3) All of the bad publicity lately about the Hornets only caring about the bottom line has probably hurt sales. This is a good way to save some money in the present while convincing people that they really do care about winning.
4) All of the talking Chris Paul has been doing lately has to have them a little spooked. Sure, Paul has no leverage to force a trade, nor does he seem to be that kind of person, but it's generally not a good thing to have an unhappy franchise player.
5) It helps them cope with some of their injury risk. I know Okafor has been injured quite a bit early in his career, but that hasn't been the case the past two seasons. Given the Hornets' tendency to get injured, having someone a little more stable sure helps.
6) They get shorter. I'm not sure why that's a good thing, but I don't think they have anyone on their roster taller than 6'10" and plays regular minutes. That has to count for something, right? Hmm.... moving on now....
7) Even though it's not some great accomplishment, Okafor is a better offensive player than Tyson "I dunk everything" Chandler, and that was on a Charlotte team devoid of weapons. I think Okafor would fare much better as a 3rd option behind Paul and David West. Defensively, Chandler is the better player, but Okafor is no slouch either.
However, I can't figure out for the life of me why the Bobcats bit on this deal. A great defensive player on a defense oriented team isn't some big boon. Gaining future cap space is fine and dandy, but they could have just, you know, not re-resign Okafor. The only thing I can think of is Larry Brown getting trade happy again.
You knew that was going to happen.
Being a Nate-Sized (minus all the muscle and awesome athleticism), small Asian guy, it hurt. A lot. And I think he tried to step on me too. If only I was Bruce Bowen
I now scream out the score after every basket, bc landing on your back does not feel good. But people hate me for it.
Like Starbury would say..."No hate here, where's the love" (or something to that effect.
Back to studying for finals, my friends. Keep up the good work, this site gives me a brighter outlook on this forsaken world.
*puts on asbestos suit*
People who play pickup ball are mildly retarded in my opinion, and their girlfriends are ten times worse.
Games are all played to 6, with no 2's. They play with a "3-second" rule in a half court game of 3-on-3!
and what Anonymous 3 said suddenly helped me made total sense out of the situation.
granted asians never had a chance of being even remotely competitive in bball (unless you're genetically engineered to be 7'6") to begin with; no 2's and the 3 second rules worsen any chances a kid might have to develope a practical game.
the 3 second rule prevents kids from gaining experience defending and playing in the post, and the no 2's minimizes the motivation to develope a long range game.
i was very pleased with my self when i was an 8th grader dominating taiwan college students and grown up's until i realized how pathetic the competition level is in asia, sad.
btw, more livin' large please :)
On a different note...freaky stuff relating to the Chicago Bulls.
Good post though, very true
if the basket can't be described in detail by how many uncalled fouls occurred, chances are the guy is just making it up.
was the 1/2 scoring system in pickup devised by the old men who can hit hook shots from 3 point range and would tear their acl for the 24th time if they ventured into the paint? should this even be a question?
Agreed. And no basket continuation either. If you want an "and one" don't call a foul.